Legal Opinion

Ruth v. Cox

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

As to the chattel mortgage herein involved, the trial court adjudged and decreed:

“That that certain chattel mortgage in the complaint and in the answer and cross-complaint of the defendant John Larsson mentioned and described and by the defendant Larsson sought to be foreclosed in his cross-complaint, executed by the defendant Edward E. Cox, as mortgagor, to and in favor of defendant John Larsson, as mortgagee, and bearing date August 4,1924, and, on that date, duly recorded at page 125, in volume 10, Records of Chattel Mortgages, in the office of the county clerk of Clatsop county, Oregon,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miller v. SherrySupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. Leavengood v. McGeeOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Paden & Co. v. Bellenger & RallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. Orton v. OrtonOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Dawson v. SimsOregon Supreme Court · 1887

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schultz v. First Nat. Bk. of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hall's Western Auto Supply Co. v. BrockOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Bays v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Chambers v. Hot Lake SanatoriumOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  5. First Nat. Bank of Burns v. FrazierOregon Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API