Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Sykes
Supreme Court of Virginia
The opinion states the case.
1Dissent
Buchanan, Miller and Snead, JJ.,
dissenting.
Buchanan, J..:
We dissent from the conclusion reached by the majority in this case because we believe it is contrary to the established legal principle governing the weight of a jury’s verdict approved by the trial judge, as this one was, and because it gives no weight to facts which the jury could and did consider in arriving at their verdict.
The legal principle referred to is stated as recently as today in Bates v. Thompson, ante p. 501: “We have repeatedly held that if reasonable men may differ as to the conclusion of fact to be drawn from the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Southern Pac. Co. v. HaightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
- Carbone v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. SteinmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.