Legal Opinion

Bowler v. Braun

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 27, 1895No. Nos. 9432-(64)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action in the district court for Scott county against Julius Braun, Mathilda Braun and John Niemann. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $602.50. From a judgment entered in pursuance of the verdict and also from an order, Cadwell, J., denying a motion for a new trial, defendant Niemann appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

On November 14, 1893, the plaintiff, a banker, having in his hands, for collection, a note belonging to the defendant John Niemann, collected it by receiving the interest due and a new note for the principal, of $550, from the makers, Julius Braun and Mathilda Braun, payable to John Niemann, the same payee. The next day after the collection was made, the new note and the interest paid, less plaintiff’s charges, were delivered to the payee, John Niemann, and by him taken to his home, and kept there for five or six days, when he and his son, Fritz Niemann, also one of these defendants, returned…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Dorset Marble Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1888
  2. Coon v. PrudenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  3. Perry v. FriendSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Porter v. Winona & Dakota Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. Burwell v. GaylordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API