Legal Opinion

Flower v. Brumbach

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 13, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. John P. Altgeld, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtGary, J.

This case is here for the second time. In 20 Ill. App. 219 it is reported, the parties being reversed. The questions then decided are not here open to review. The authorities for this rule up to the time that Ogle v. Turpin, 8 Ill. App. 453, was decided, are very fully cited by Bailey, J., in that case. Since then other cases to the same effect have followed. Cable v. Ellis, 120 Ill. 136; Mfg. Co. v. Wire F. Co., 119 Ill. 30; W., St. L. & P. v. Peterson, 115 Ill. 597.

If the principal question decided when the ease was here before were now to be decided I should not take any part, as the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cable v. EllisIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Washburn & Moen Manufacturing Co. v. Chicago Galvanized Wire Fence Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Brant v. GallupIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Miner v. PhillipsIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Case v. AyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1872

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. HoytAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  2. Penn v. SchmisseurAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API