Legal Opinion
Grothaus v. Warner, 08ap-115 (10-28-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 28, 2008No. 08AP-115PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Clint A. Warner dba Quality Irrigation Systems ("Warner"), appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Municipal Court in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Jeanne C. Grothaus ("Grothaus"), on her claims for breach of contract, breach of warranties, and unjust enrichment. Grothaus cross-appeals from the trial court's dismissal of her claim under the Consumer Sales Practices Act ("CSPA").
{¶ 2} The facts underlying this matter are straight-forward and undisputed. In the spring of 2001, Grothaus and her fiancé, Ken Curtin ("Curtin"), 1 inquired about Warner…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Kostelnik v. HelperOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Kostelnik v. HelperOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Johnson v. Microsoft Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
- Hill v. Sonitrol of Southwestern Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wee Care Child Ctr., Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Olive Branch Holdings, L.L.C. v. Smith Technology Development, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009