Greystone Homes, Inc. v. Cake
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAERLE, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
The question presented by this appeal is whether a project to build a housing development in Pleasant Hill constituted a public work subject to California’s prevailing wage law (PWL). Both the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) and the lower court found that the project was a public work. The developer, Greystone Homes, Inc. (Greystone), and the Pleasant Hill Redevelopment Agency (the Agency) disagree and have filed separate appeals from a judgment denying Greystone’s petition for writ of mandate.-
This court consolidated the two appeals. Respondents are…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lusardi Construction Co. v. AubryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Long Beach v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- McIntosh v. AubryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Lancaster Redevelopment Agency v. DibleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
3Cited by10 opinions
- Oxbow Carbon & Minerals, LLC v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Plumbers & Steamfitters, Local 290 v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Hensel Phelps Construction Co. v. San Diego Unified Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Cinema W., LLC v. Baker, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Abraham Abittan, et al. v. Hansen Law Firm, P.C., et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.