Legal Opinion · Dissent

E.T.O., Inc. v. Town of Marion

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 15, 1985No. C5-84-1234Published

1DissentWozniak, Judge

I respectfully dissent. There exists no factual determination to be resolved, but only questions of law which this court can and should resolve in the interest of judicial economy. I would affirm the trial court pursuant to directions as contained herein.

ADDITIONAL FACTS

On December 15, 1981, incorporators of E.T.O., d/b/a “Fergie’s Bar,” appeared before the County Board of Olmsted County to advise it of their plans to remodel and renovate the subject property upon condition that the Board indicate its willingness to approve a liquor license at this location. The County Board voted in favor of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. City of Kenosha v. BrunoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API