Tompkins v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
Generally, except in so far as a railroad company may be limited by its grant, its charter, or by statute, the right-of-way acquired by it may be used for any lawful purpose convenient or necessaiy to the operation of the railroad. 74 C. J. S. 500, § 99; 44 Am. Jur. 338, § 126. There is no statute in Georgia prohibiting a railroad company from building a sidetrack on its right-of-way. The charter powers of the defendant authorize the construction of a sidetrack, and the use of the right-of-way of the defendant for the purposes described in the petition is not limited by its…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Gaston v. Gainesville & Dahlonega Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Tift v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Tompkins v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
3Cited by7 opinions
- Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company v. FreerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Zobrist v. CulpCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Latham Homes Sanitation, Inc. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Yawn v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.