Legal Opinion

Tompkins v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 12, 1957No. 19587PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

Generally, except in so far as a railroad company may be limited by its grant, its charter, or by statute, the right-of-way acquired by it may be used for any lawful purpose convenient or necessaiy to the operation of the railroad. 74 C. J. S. 500, § 99; 44 Am. Jur. 338, § 126. There is no statute in Georgia prohibiting a railroad company from building a sidetrack on its right-of-way. The charter powers of the defendant authorize the construction of a sidetrack, and the use of the right-of-way of the defendant for the purposes described in the petition is not limited by its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Gaston v. Gainesville & Dahlonega Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Tift v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Tompkins v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company v. FreerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Zobrist v. CulpCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  3. Latham Homes Sanitation, Inc. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Yawn v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API