Legal Opinion

Preston v. Breedlove

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1872PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from Grimes. Tried below before the Hon. James It. Burnett. In the third head-note will be found, in a condensed form, the allegations contained in the amended answer of the defendant in the court below, to which the court below erroneously sustained the plaintiff's demurrer.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This case is brought to this court on writ of error, and the following causes are assigned :—

First. The court erred in rendering judgment for a certain number of dollars in specie,,, in violation of the legal tender act of the United States.

Second. The court erred in overruling defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Third. The court erred in sustaining plaintiff’s demurrer to defendant’s amended answer.

Touching the first assignment of error, we may here remark that we have hitherto endeavored to follow the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States, and in doing so our own decisions may…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Central Railway Co. v. GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stuart v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Whisenant v. Shores-Mueller Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Waters v. Byers Bros. & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Lee v. First Nat. Bank of PurdonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Geyser Ice Co. v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API