Legal Opinion

Whisenant v. Shores-Mueller Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 10, 1917No. 710PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of Case.

HIGGINS, J.

This suit was instituted by appellee against J. H. Whisenant as principal debtor, and T. J. Hanson and A. N. Steele as guarantors, to recover a balance of $394.06 due on open account for goods sold and delivered to Whisenant. It was alleged that the goods were furnished Whis-. enant under a written contract which reads:

“Whereas, J. H. Whisenant of Comanche, Texas, hereinafter called the salesman, desires to engage in the business of selling the extracts, spices, toilet goods, household medicines, veterinary remedies, and other goods, manufactured or sold by…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Thomas v. HammondTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Coverdill v. SeymourTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Segal v. McCall CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1916
  4. J. R. Watkins Medical Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Walhoefer Bros. v. Hobgood, Brown & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. LandTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Caddell v. J. R. Watkins Medical Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. LandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API