Legal Opinion

Coggins v. Stephens & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 9, 1884PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Assignment. Debtor and Creditor. Fraud. Before Judge Estes. Hall Superior Court. February Term, 1884. Rt ported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Justice.

The plaintiff and others levied certain executions upon *415property in the possession of Coggins, as the property of Faulkner, the defendant in fi. fa. To the property thus levied on, Coggins interposed a claim, and upon the trial of the issue formed thereon, the propérty was found subject. The claimant moved for a new trial, upon the following grounds:

(1.) Because the verdict is contrary to the law governing the finding of the jury in such cases.

(2.) Because the verdict is not supported by the evidence.

(3.) Because the evidence showed the trade between Coggins and Faulkner was in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crittenden Bros. v. Coleman & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1883

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Silver & Goldstein v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Turnipseed v. SchaeferSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  3. Powell, Brother & Co. v. Kelly Bros. & PorterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  4. Williams v. CrockerSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  5. Kiser & Co. v. Dannenberg Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API