Legal Opinion

Rehmani v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 2012No. H036828PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELIA, J.

—In this proceeding petitioner Mustafa Rehmani seeks a writ of mandate to overturn an order granting summary adjudication to his employer, real party in interest Ericsson, Inc. Rehmani contends that the superior court erroneously dismissed his claims of workplace harassment based on national *948origin and religion, violations of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Government Code section 12940.1 We agree with Rehmani that triable issues exist as to Ericsson’s liability for harassment. We will therefore grant the petition and issue the writ.

Background

Petitioner…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Roby v. McKesson Corp.California Supreme Court · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Harris v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Noe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. See's Candy Shops, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. McGrory v. Applied Signal Technology, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Robles v. Agreserves, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API