King v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Doyle, Judge.
Following this Court’s 2005 affirmance of his conviction of conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, Roger King (pro se) appeals from the denial of his 2007 motion to correct and vacate a void sentence. King contends that he was improperly sentenced for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute because his indictment did not specifically indict him with conspiracy. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
1. In all instances, this Court has a duty to inquire into our jurisdiction.
Ordinarily, our determination on direct appeal of a criminal judgment is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gunter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Hamby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Wells v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Rowe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Stuart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Roger King v. WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Roger King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Zorie Stuart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012