Legal Opinion

Cropmate Co. v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 25, 2000No. 4-99-0377 WCPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rarick

Claimant, Jeffrey Pinkerton, sought benefits pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) (820 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 1994)) for injuries sustained while in the employ of Cropmate Company (Cropmate). Claimant worked for his uncle, William Pinkerton (Pinkerton), who was erecting a pole building for Cropmate. On August 15, 1994, while working on the roof of the building, claimant slipped and sustained a severe laceration to his right forearm.

Pinkerton contracted with Cropmate to erect a chemical containment building on Cropmate’s property in White Hall, Illinois, as required by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Granite City v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. Ingalls Memorial Hospital v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Pulliam v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Fefferman v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Graphic Group & KLW, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keating v. 68th & Paxton, L.L.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  2. Pietrzak v. INDUSTRIAL COMM'N OF ILLINOISAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Interstate Scaffolding, Inc. v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  4. Cropmate Co. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  5. Interstate Scaffolding, Inc. v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API