Legal Opinion

Fountain v. Ingram

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 14, 2005No. 1040539PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gayle P. Fountain d/b/a Pioneer Sales ("Pioneer") in Brewton appeals from an order denying her motion to compel arbitration of a dispute between Pioneer and Kimberly Ingram, which arose out of Ingram's purchase of a mobile home from Pioneer. We affirm.

On February 27, 2003, in connection with her purchase of the mobile home, Ingram signed a "Manufactured Home Retail Installment Contract, No. 144477" ("the installment contract"). The parties to the installment contract were Pioneer and Ingram. The installment contract set out the principal amount of the purchase and the rate of interest and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Homes of Legend, Inc. v. McColloughSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Ex Parte DyessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Stamey v. EasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Parkway Dodge, Inc. v. YarbroughSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Atelier Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  2. Second Avenue Holdings, LLC v. Latimer (In re Latimer)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2013
  3. Ex Parte Cintas CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  4. Fountain v. IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  5. Morton v. D.R. Horton, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API