Legal Opinion

Fountain v. Ingram

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 14, 2005No. 1040539Published

1Opinion of the Court

926 So.2d 333 (2005)

Gayle P. FOUNTAIN d/b/a Pioneer Sales

v.

Kimberly INGRAM.

1040539.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 14, 2005.

M. Andrew Donaldson and Edward C. Hixon of Slaten & O'Connor, P.C., Montgomery, for appellant.

Anthony J. Bishop of Cassady & Bishop, P.C., Evergreen, for appellee.

WOODALL, Justice.

Gayle P. Fountain d/b/a Pioneer Sales ("Pioneer") in Brewton appeals from an order denying her motion to compel arbitration of a dispute between Pioneer and Kimberly Ingram, which arose out of Ingram's purchase of a mobile home from Pioneer. We affirm.

On February 27, 2003, in connection with…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Homes of Legend, Inc. v. McColloughSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Ex Parte DyessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Stamey v. EasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Parkway Dodge, Inc. v. YarbroughSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API