Smith v. Pacific Intermountain Express Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
In Wiles, supra, the North Carolina Supreme Court held that a summons directed to an officer of a corporation is not defective *251if the caption of the summons and the complaint clearly indicate that the corporation and not the registered agent of the corporation was the intended defendant. See, e.g., Wearring v. Belk Brothers, Inc., 38 N.C. App. 375, 248 S.E. 2d 90 (1978); West v. Reddick, Inc., 38 N.C. App. 370, 248 S.E. 2d 112 (1978); Public Relations, Inc. v. Enterprises, Inc., 36 N.C. App. 673, 245 S.E. 2d 782 (1978).
In the case sub judice, the defendant concedes, and we agree,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gro-Mar Public Relations, Inc. v. Billy Jack Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- West v. G. D. Reddick, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Wearring v. BELK BROTHERS INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Smith v. Pacific Intermountain Express Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977