Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Hartigan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 25, 2007No. A05-1308Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action seeking reciprocal discipline under Rule 12(d), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), based on an order of the Wisconsin Supreme Court suspending respondent Seth Patrick Hartigan from the practice of law for a period of six months. On August 11, 2005, we suspended respondent under Rule 12(c), RLPR, because he could not be found in the state to respond to the allegations of the petition. On October 25, 2006, we ordered respondent to show cause why we should not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against HeinemannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Disciplinary Proceedings Against HartiganWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API