Westberg v. Pettiford
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court fox Anoka county to subrogate plaintiff to all the rights acquired by defendant Hudson in the foreclosure of the third mortgage mentioned in the first sentence of the opinion, and the assignment -thereof, to recover $2,200 -and interest from defendant Sophia C. Pettiford, and for a decree that plaintiff had a valid purchase money lien upon the mortgaged premises for that amount.
Read the full summary
Action in the district court fox Anoka county to subrogate plaintiff to all the rights acquired by defendant Hudson in the foreclosure of the third mortgage mentioned in the first sentence of the opinion, and the assignment -thereof, to recover $2,200 -and interest from defendant Sophia C. Pettiford, and for a decree that plaintiff had a valid purchase money lien upon the mortgaged premises for that amount. The case was tried before Giddings, J., who made findings as stated in the second paragraph of the opinion, and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying her motion for…
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
Defendant Sophia C. Pettiford owned a piece of land in Anoka county. There weTe three mortgages against it, the first to the State Bank of Anoka, the second to plaintiff, and the third to W. O. Jackson. Mrs. Pettiford had purchased the property subject to the first and had assumed and agreed to pay it. -She 'had given the second and third. The first mortgage was foreclosed by sale May 29, 1918. Later, the third was foreclosed and the certificate of sale assigned to defendant Hudson. On May 29, 1919, defendant Hudson filed notice of intention to redeem from the bank mortgage and also took an…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Probstfield v. CzizekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
3Cited by2 opinions
- Oman v. BalfanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Newgard v. FreelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936