Legal Opinion

Oman v. Balfany

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 16, 1925No. 24,264PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

This is an action in replevin to recover possession of an egg carton machine. The court found that plaintiff is the owner and entitled to the possession of the machine subject to a lien thereon held by defendant Anna Balfany. The sole question presented on this appeal is whether the findings of fact sustain the conclusion that defendant Anna Balfany is entitled to a lien on the property. It is clear that they do not.

The court found, in substance, that Earl W. Koeser was the owner of the patents pertaining to the machine, and was also the president and principal stockholder of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Birke v. AbbottIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. White v. SchaderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Wentworth v. TubbsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Carlton v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  5. Probstfield v. CzizekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morris v. TwichellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Newgard v. FreelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API