Legal Opinion
In re AMR Corp.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 13, 2013No. Case No. 11-15463(SHL) (Jointly Administered)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chapter 11
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
Sean H. Lane, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
Before the Court is the objection (ECF No. 9427) of the United States Trustee (the “Trustee”) to confirmation of the Debtors’ Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan (the “Plan”) (ECF No. 8590). The Trustee raises two objections.1 First, the Trustee argues that the Plan violates Section 503(b) of the Bankruptcy Code by paying the professional fees of individual members on the Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the “Committee”). Second, the Trustee contends that the Plan violates Section 503(c) by paying a severance of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Kucana v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Radlax Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- In Re Dana Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Mabey v. Southwestern Electric Power Co. (In Re Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Davis v. Elliot Management Corp. (In re Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Fjord v. AMR Corp. (In re AMR Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2013