Himmel v. Hendler
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.
The question presented for determination by this appeal is: Does the structure proposed to be erected by the appellees (defendants below) violate the restrictive covenant contained in the deed under which they hold? The chancellor determined that it did not, and dismissed the bill of complaint which sought to enjoin the defendants from erecting the proposed fence. From that action the plaintiff appealed.
The facts necessary for an understanding of this question may be stated as follows: The plaintiff and defendants are the owners of adjoining lots fronting on Lake Drive in Baltimore City.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Easterbrook v. Hebrew Ladies Orphan SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Peabody Heights Co. v. WillsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
- Wood v. StehrerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
- Downen v. RayburnIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Bartell v. SengerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- McKenrick v. Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- County Commissioners of Charles County v. ST. CHARLES ASSOCIATES LTD.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Miller v. BAY CITY PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOC., INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Matthews v. Kernewood, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Belleview Construction Co. v. Rugby Hall Community Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.