Milonas v. Public Employment Relations Board
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Carpinello, J.
At issue in this case is the rate to be paid by the Unified Court System (hereinafter UCS) to court reporters when individual Judges request transcripts of proceedings. In New York, court reporters are compensated in two different ways. They are salaried employees of the UCS, but they are also entitled to payment for transcripts requested by a litigant, by a litigant’s attorney and, under certain circumstances, by a Judge.
In 1983, the UCS and a coalition of court reporter unions from across the State entered into a memorandum of understanding (hereinafter…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. GiancontieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Van Wagner Advertising Corp. v. S & M EnterprisesNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re the Arbitration Between Western Union Telegraph Co. & American Communications Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Katel Ltd. Liability Co. v. AT & T CORP.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Lippman v. Public Employment Relations BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Geneva Pharmaceuticals Technology Corp. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- XO Communications, LLC v. Level 3 Communications, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
- Zilinskas v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.