Legal Opinion

American Home Assurance Co. v. A.P. MollerMaersk A/S

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 25, 2015No. 14-1212Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

14‐1212 American Home Assurance Co. v. A.P. MollerMaersk A/S UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Wood v. MilyardSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Project Hope v. M/V IBN SINACourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  5. American Home Assurance v. A.P. Moller-MaerskDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API