Hastings v. Huber
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, Justice
The appeal is from a decree of the probate court in the settlement of a guardianship. The decisions of this court are to the effect that a guardian is chargeable with any property of the ward which could have been received or recovered by the use of reasonable ■ diligence to that end — the diligence which a prudent man would exercise in the prosecution of his own like affairs. Sims v. Russell, 236 Ala. 562, 183 So. 862; Dumas v. Hollins, 228 Ala. 644, 154 So. 781; Hall v. Esslinger, 235 Ala. 451, 179 So. 639; Code of 1923, §§ 8149, 8170.
It is further a rule of evidence that when a guardian…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Spence v. SpenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Gaunt v. Tucker's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
- Childs v. JulianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Williams v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
- Ashley's Administratrix v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Scott v. KelleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999