Legal Opinion

Hastings v. Huber

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 17, 1941No. 8 Div. 74PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, Justice

The appeal is from a decree of the probate court in the settlement of a guardianship. The decisions of this court are to the effect that a guardian is chargeable with any property of the ward which could have been received or recovered by the use of reasonable ■ diligence to that end — the diligence which a prudent man would exercise in the prosecution of his own like affairs. Sims v. Russell, 236 Ala. 562, 183 So. 862; Dumas v. Hollins, 228 Ala. 644, 154 So. 781; Hall v. Esslinger, 235 Ala. 451, 179 So. 639; Code of 1923, §§ 8149, 8170.

It is further a rule of evidence that when a guardian…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Spence v. SpenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. Gaunt v. Tucker's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
  3. Childs v. JulianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  4. Williams v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
  5. Ashley's Administratrix v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scott v. KelleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API