Legal Opinion

In Re Whitten

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 20, 1981No. Bankruptcy 81-00018PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

(Order Directed to Debtor’s Attorney Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 220 and U.S.C. § 329)

ROGER M. WHELAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue to be addressed in this Rule 220 hearing is whether Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code may be utilized to stay a foreclosure sale, when the intent is to use the delay afforded by the automatic stay provision of 11 U.S.C. § 362 solely to seek refinancing of the debtor’s residence and with no intent to ever effectuate a Chapter 13 plan. The Court, after careful review of the legislative history and statutory provisions dealing with the contents of a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re ThackerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 1980

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. In Re KinneyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1985
  2. Gaudet v. Kirshenbaum Investment Co. (In Re Gaudet)District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1991
  3. In Re GreenbergUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  4. In Re Harper-ElderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
  5. In Re HogueUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API