Legal Opinion

Clorox Co. v. Inland Empire Wholesale Grocers, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 3, 1994No. CV-93-4528-JMI (Ex)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEVER AND STAY COUNTERCLAIM

ORDER GRANTING REQUESTS FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART APPLICATION OF MORCO FOODS TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; COUNTERCLAIMS AND CROSSCLAIMS

IDEMAN, District Judge.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

Counter-defendant L & F PRODUCTS INC. (hereinafter referred to as “L & F”) filed a Motion to Dismiss Counts II and III of Counterclaim of Blue Cross Laboratories and Darrell G. Mahler (alternatively Motion for More Definite Statement on Count I). L & F also filed a Motion to Sever…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Major League Baseball Promotion Corp. v. Colour-Tex, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  3. Electronic Laboratory Supply Company, Inc. And Jack Snyderman v. Raymond T. Cullen, Ronald B. Hauben, and Joseph WolfsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. General Electric Co. v. SpeicherDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United Tactical Systems, LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API