Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Southard

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 2003No. 90A02-0208-CV-675PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellants-Petitioners, Daniel E. Lambert, Individually (Lambert), and as Guardian for Lee Wayne Lambert (Lee Lambert), (collectively, the Lamberts), appeal the trial court's Order regarding ownership of assets.

We affirm.

ISSUES

The Lamberts raise two issues for our review, which we restate as follows:

1. Whether the trial court erred by finding a witness incompetent to testify; and

2. Whether the trial court erred in finding that no resulting trust or constructive trust was created with respect to the decedent's insurance proceeds.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Satterthwaite v. Estate of SatterthwaiteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. State Farm Life Insurance Co. v. Fort Wayne National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. J.M. Corp. v. RobersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of LambertIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API