Legal Opinion

Trindle v. Consolidated Independent School District

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 17, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

The question of a bond issue was submitted to the voters of the Consolidated Independent School District of Yan Meter on December 27, 1922, and the proposal was duly carried. Pursuant thereto, it was the purpose of the board of directors of such district, named as defendants herein, to issue and sell the proposed bonds. The case came on for trial on April 20, 1923. The record presents no dispute of fact, although the respective arguments are predicated upon conflicting inferences of fact.

It was stipulated upon the trial that the 5 per cent limit of indebtedness permissible to this district…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grant v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  2. Swanson v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Tuttle v. PolkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  4. Rowley v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. Miller v. City of GlenwoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wickey v. Muscatine CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  2. Banta v. Clarke CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  3. Holst v. Consolidated Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Trepp v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. Holst v. Consolidated Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API