Legal Opinion

Simms v. Stark Electric Railway Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Mahoning county.

1Opinion of the CourtPollock, J.

The plaintiff in error, Eliza Simms, began an action in the court of common pleas of this county against the defendant in error, alleging in her petition that the defendant was operating an electric railroad from the city of Alliance to the village .of Sebring; that the plaintiff’s intestate, at the time alleged, purchased a ticket and became a passenger on one of defendant’s *265car's, intending to ride from the city of Alliance to Sebring; and that he was unlawfully ejected from the car by the conductor at a stop on defendant’s road, known as No. 47. She further alleges that at the time Arthur…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Norfolk & Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. Killian v. EigenmannIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. McMasters v. Westchester County Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1841
  4. Spurr v. Inhabitants of ShelburneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  5. Woods v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bonnell v. MitchelDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
  2. Pitts v. Howe Scale Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  3. Jeffrey Steidle v. United States Liability Insurance Co IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2026
  4. United States v. Cornelius GreenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API