Legal Opinion

Northrop v. Marquam

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1888PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah County.

1Opinion of the CourtStrahan, J.

This is an action of ejectment to recover an undivided one fourth of certain real property situated in Multnomah County.

This cause was tried before the court without a jury, and the following facts and conclusions of law were found by the court:—

1. That Henry C. Northrop, being an inhabitant of Multnomah County, Oregon, died in said county on the twenty-seventh day of June, 1370, seised-and possessed at the time of his death of the undivided half of the whole tract of land described in the complaint herein, and J. C. Van Renssalaer was seised and possessed of the other undivided half.

2. That…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barr v. Gratz's HeirsSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Phelps' v. . PondNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  3. Power v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. M'Clung v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  5. Culver v. . RhodesNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Le Vasseur v. RoullmanMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Neal v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Wren v. DixonNevada Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Donald Gene Boag v. Chief of Police, City of Portland, and City of Portland, OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. State v. AtwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1909

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API