Wasserman v. City of New York
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
Plaintiff in the above-captioned case brings this motion under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeking relief from a Memorandum and Order of this court, dated October 8, 1992, which granted summary judgment in favor of defendant the City of New York (the “City”). Wasserman v. New York, 802 F.Supp. 849 (E.D.N.Y.1992). Plaintiffs motion rests primarily upon an allegation that a witness upon whose testimony this court relied misrepresented the extent of the City’s studies of the accident location involved in this action as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Friedman v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Gollust v. MendellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mendell ex rel. Viacom Inc. v. GollustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Ames v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Wasserman v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.