Legal Opinion

Sedor v. Wolicki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1994No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, defendants’ motion denied, complaint reinstated and plaintiffs’ motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of defendants for summary judgment. Plaintiffs instituted this action for a permanent injunction compelling defendants to remove a chain link fence that they had erected across a 15-foot right-of-way on their property, which had been used by plaintiffs for ingress and egress to and from their driveway.

In 1952, Robert Blum, the owner of a large parcel of property on Conesus Lake, subdivided the property into…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strnad v. BrudnickiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Dillon v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Dillon v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shawangunk Conservancy, Inc. v. FinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Fischer v. Zepa Consulting AG.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Mentiply v. FosterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  4. Fischer v. AngerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Johnson v. ZelanisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API