Legal Opinion
Strnad v. Brudnicki
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 31, 1994PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 for a judgment declaring the validity of an easement and a permanent injunction preventing interference with its use, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Brown, J.), entered July 17, 1991, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.
The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of a final judgment in the action on March 10, 1993 (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241).…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Two Guys From Harrison-NY v. S.F.R. Realty AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Cinerama, Inc. v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Strnad v. BrudnickiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by33 opinions
- Webster v. RagonaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Green v. MannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Spier v. HorowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Heim v. ConroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Corrarino v. ByrnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.