Legal Opinion
Stephens v. Benson
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1862PublishedCited by 13 opinions
APPEAL from the Pulaski Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.
Suit for overflowing lands by the erection of a mill-dam.
Answer. Setting up an unsealed, unacknowledged, but signed and recorded instrument in writing, made by Hall, the grantor of Benson, the plaintiff, as follows:
“ Whereas, John Stephens, James O. Shultz, and Don. Short, contemplate erecting a dam across the Tippecanoe river, about six miles below Winnemac, near Esquire Brown’s, on lots Nos. 3 and 6, in section 9, township 29, north, of B. 2, west, and contemplate the erection of mills below said dam, to the hight of six feet; and whereas, we, the undersigned, the occupants and owners of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by13 opinions
- Owens v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Maxwell v. Bay City Bridge Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Messick v. Midland Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Buchanan v. Logansport, Crawfordsville & Southwestern R. W. Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Arterburn v. BeardNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.