Legal Opinion

Tanquary v. People

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1914No. Nos. 3660, 3777PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeals from Denver District Court. Hon. Carlton M. Bliss, Judge (3660); Hon. Greeley W. Whiteord, Judge (3777).

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

These two suits were actions of debt brought by the People of the State of Colorado to recover from N. Q. Tanquary and others the sum of $1,500 and $1,000 respectively, the penalties named in two bail bonds or recognizances. In each case the defendant Tanquary, one of the sureties, filed an answer containing two defenses. As the judgment against Tanquary must be reversed for error of the court in sustaining a demurrer to the second defense, it will not be necessary to make further mention of the first defense.

The complaint in the first ease (No. 46699 of thé' district court) alleged that on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Van FossenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas · 1871
  2. Haney v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  3. People ex rel. Attorney General v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  4. People v. WittIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Hadaway v. HynsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Durbin v. Bonanza Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. CaroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. Herbertson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  4. State v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Southard v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API