Legal Opinion

Dix-Ferndale Taxpayers' Ass'n v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1932No. Docket No. 168, Calendar No. 35,626PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

In this suit plaintiffs seek vacation of special taxes assessed against their several properties for widening Yernor highway in the city of Detroit. That highway was widened to 80 feet for a long distance east of Twenty-fourth street, and from Twenty-fourth street west the former street, with change of name only, was left at its width of 46 feet. The properties of plaintiffs are upon the part of the street west of Twenty-fourth street, and also upon a street that diverges therefrom at Waterman street. No property belonging to any of plaintiffs abuts upon the widened part of the street, yet…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marks v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wikman v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Plymouth Township v. Wayne County Board of CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. New York Central Railroad v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Brill v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Carmichael v. Village of Beverly HillsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API