Legal Opinion
McQuilken v. a & R DEVELOPMENT CORP.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 5, 1983No. Civ. A. 81-419PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in this case, Robert and Jean McQuilken and Joseph Crowley, seek to recover for damages to their property caused by construction activity on the Whitman Park site. They also seek to represent a class consisting of “all persons residing in and/or owners of homes located on the East side of the 2500 and 2600 blocks of South 2nd Street, and on the North side of the 100 block of Porter Street, all in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.” Before the court are the motions of defendants, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of Greenwood v. PeacockSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation)District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- In re Asbestos School LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Boggs v. Divested Atomic Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
- Smith v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1989
- Jenkins v. Raymark Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.