Legal Opinion
Boggs v. Divested Atomic Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 7, 1991No. C-2-90-840PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KINNEARY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Teresa Boggs, a resident of Lucasville, Ohio, lives within six miles of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant. The •plant, which is located in rural Pike County, Ohio, approximately four miles from the town of Piketon, processes radioactive materials for the United States Department of Energy. It began operating in the early 1950’s and has continuously produced enriched uranium since that time.
Ms. Boggs and the other named plaintiffs, residents of either Pike or Scioto Counties who also live within six miles of the plant, claim that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- 12 Fair empl.prac.cas. 451, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,741 John Senter, Cross-Appellee v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- William Barnes v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- O'Connor v. Boeing North American, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
- Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.