Legal Opinion

Graham v. Karr

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 31, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action to determine title and for partition. The circuit court determined the interests of the parties in favor of the claim of defendant James M. Karr, Jr., and adversely to those of plaintiff and defendant Vivian Karr and rendered interlocutory judgment of partition accordingly. Defendant Vivian Karr alone appealed from the judgment. The plaintiff has made no appearance in this court. When we speak of respondent herein we shall have reference to James M. Karr, Jr.

Agnes Bell Karr is the widow and defendants James M. Karr, Jr., and Vivian Karr are the only children and heirs of James M. Karr…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Burnham v. . ComfortNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Weston v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. McCoy v. BradburySupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  4. Marshall v. RenchCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1868
  5. Turpin v. TurpinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Aden v. DaltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. Buder v. StockeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  3. Robertson v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. Maestas v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Butler v. ButlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API