Legal Opinion

Succession of Johnson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 3, 1953No. 41113PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LE BLANC, Justice.

This case presents the ever recurring problem before the Courts where there is a contest over a will which allegedly contains a disposition that is prohibited under our law and is therefore invalid. Another issue concerns the appointment of an administrator or executor to the estate. The law having reference to dispositions such as are reprobated is found in Article 1520 of the LSA-Civil -Code, which reads in part as follows:

“Substitutions and fidei commissa are and remain prohibited.
“Every disposition by which the donee, the heir, or legatee is charged to preserve for or to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Succession of ReillySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  2. Succession of HallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  3. Succession of HeftSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  4. Girven v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  5. Dufour v. DeresheidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Contempt Proceeding of SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. In Re Succession of Abraham.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Succession of WaltersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  4. Succession of StewartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  5. Crichton v. Succession of GredlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API