Legal Opinion
Association of Connecticut Lobbyists LLC v. Garfield
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 27, 2007No. Civil Action No. 3:06cv1030 (SRU)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS TO INTERVENE
UNDERHILL, District Judge.
The proposed intervenor-defendants, Audrey Blondin, Kim Hynes, Tom Sevigny, Connecticut Common Cause (“CCC”) and Connecticut Citizens Action Group (“CCAG”), have moved to intervene in two consolidated actions challenging Connecticut’s recently-enacted campaign finance reform law. For reasons that follow, their motions are granted.
I. Background
On December 7, 2005, the Connecticut General Assembly passed “An Act Concerning Comprehensive Campaign Finance Reform for State-Wide Constitutional and General Assembly Offices.” The law, codified…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States Postal Service v. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- John Brennan v. N.Y.C. Board Of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Bridgeport Guardians v. DelmonteDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pike Co. v. Universal Concrete Prods., Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Allco Finance Ltd. v. EtsyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Green Party of Connecticut v. GarfieldDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Green Party of CT v. GarfieldDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- 753 East 226 LLC v. The New York City Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.