Legal Opinion

Tri-City Associates, L.P. v. Belmont, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 2016No. 27449PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Justice (on reassignment).

[¶ 1.] In this second appeal, Tri-City Associates, L.P. argues that the circuit court erred when it entered a judgment in favor of Belmont, Inc. In Tri-City Assocs., L.P. v. Belmont, Inc. (Tri-City I), we had reversed and remanded the case for the circuit court to enter “findings of fact and conclusions of law on the effect of Belmont’s failure to give notice of breach and an opportunity to cure.” 2014 S.D. 23, ¶ 24, 845 N.W.2d 911, 918. We did so because the circuit court did not address whether Belmont’s claims were barred for Belmont’s failure to follow…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Giuffre Hyundai, Ltd. v. Hyundai Motor AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  2. Poeppel v. LesterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Tri-City Assocsiates, LP v. Belmont, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Cheung-Loon, LLC v. Cergon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  5. Adrian v. McKinnieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bonkoski v. Lorain Cnty.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Bartchak v. Columbia Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API