Legal Opinion

Adrian v. McKinnie

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2004No. NonePublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] This case is before us for the second time. In the first case, we de termined that the parties’ contractual agreement was an equitable mortgage and reversed and remanded for further proceedings. On remand, Wallace Adrian (Adrian) sought foreclosure of the equitable mortgage. The trial court granted judgment in favor of Adrian, including interest and attorney’s fees. Borrowers, Lynn and Rich McKinnie (McKinnies) dispute the amount of interest and attorney’s fees owed. McKin-nies appeal. We reverse.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] McKinnies originally appealed to this Court in Adrian v.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Republic Molding Corp. v. B. W. Photo UtilitiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. Dougherty v. BeckmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. O'CONNOR v. KingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Adrian v. McKinnieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Estate of Fisher v. FisherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re South Dakota Microsoft Antitrust LitigationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Anderson v. AesophSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In Re the Matter of J.D.M.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Berbos v. KrageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Stromberger Farms, Inc. v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API