Legal Opinion

Fritsch v. Stampfli

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1897No. Sac. No. 225PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Plumas County. G. G. Clough, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Britt, C.

Suit to quiet title to a body of lands in Plumas county. Plaintiff appeals from a certain provision of the judgment to the effect that she has no title to a tract of about twenty acres, parcel of the larger body, and relies for reversal upon alleged insufficiency of the evidence to support the findings of the court. There appears in the transcript on appeal a paper entitled, “ Bill of Exceptions,” purporting to set forth evidence received at the trial, concluding with the statement that, “ The foregoing was substantially all the evidence touching the said tract of land”; following…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kimball v. SempleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Marlow v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Skillman v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Baldwin v. FerreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vierra v. FontesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Kling v. GustasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API