Marlow v. Marsh
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Fourteenth Judicial District, County of Hevada. ° »
1Opinion of the CourtField, J.
The papers, purporting to be a statement embodied in the transcript, consist of the draft prepared by the appellants, and the amendments proposed by the respondents, as they were originally served. The amendments agreed to by counsel should have been inserted in their proper place in the draft, and a fair copy of the whole made. In their separate form the draft and amendments do not constitute such a statement as we will look into on appeal.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Kling v. GustasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Kimball v. SempleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Skillman v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Baldwin v. FerreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Fritsch v. StampfliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897