Legal Opinion

Day v. Vaughn

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided October 22, 2014No. 6:14-cv-22PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*1379 ORDER

B. AVANT EDENFIELD, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Howard Joseph Day brings this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Kenneth Vaughn and James Springer (“Defendants”) for alleged violations of his Eight and Fourteenth Amendment rights. ECF No. 1. Defendants have moved to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint arguing that the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) bars Plaintiffs claims, that Plaintiffs Complaint fails to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and, alternatively, that they are entitled to qualified immunity. ECF No. 7-1 at 4,14, 21.

Because the Court agrees that the PLRA bars…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Memphis Community School District v. StachuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Murray v. McCoyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API