Legal Opinion

People v. Sixto

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 20, 1993No. F015335PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BUCKLEY, J.

Appellant Felipe Evangelista Sixto was sentenced to die for the capital murder of five-year-old Jorge Garza. His convictions were overturned due to the ineffectiveness of his trial attorneys. Upon retrial, with representation by new counsel, he was again convicted but sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. In the published portion of this opinion, we will consider the trial court’s obligation, upon retrial, to undertake curative measures designed to remedy the effect of the deficient performance of original counsel.

Procedural History

On July…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Borrello v. Respironics California, LLC (P)District Court, S.D. California · 2024
  5. Chinonye Ugorji v. County of LakeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API