Legal Opinion
Eddings v. Southern Orthopaedic & Musculoskeletal Associates, P.A.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided December 21, 2004No. COA03-1298PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, Judge.
On 16 November 1997, Tally Eddings, M.D. (Dr. Eddings or plaintiff) and Southern Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Associates, P.A. (SOMA) entered into a contract of employment. Ori 1 January 1998, Dr. Eddings and SOMA subsequently entered into a non-shareholder physician employment agreement which replaced the earlier contract of employment. Plaintiff signed both SOMA agreements which contained the following arbitration provision:(10) Dispute Resolution bv Arbitration. Any controversy, dispute, or disagreement arising out of or relating to the Agreement, including the breach…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED v. Willard S. HARTMANN, Leona R. Hartmann, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Hooters of America, Inc. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Crawford v. West Jersey Health SystemsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- King v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Hai v. Baptist Healthcare of Oklahoma, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
- Arkansas Diagnostic Center, P.A. v. TahiriSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Arkansas Diagnostic Center, P.A. v. TahiriSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Carroll v. FerroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008