Legal Opinion

Taber v. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 1, 1937No. 280PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes

The respondent, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company, holds an oil and gas lease covering lands of restricted Pawnee Indians. The question relates to the constitutional authority of the State of Oklahoma to tax certain property used by the respondent in its operations as lessee. The Supreme Court of Oklahoma held that the property was not taxable because the lessee was a federal instrumentality and Congress had not consented to its taxation. 177 Okla. 67; 57 P. (2d) 1167. We granted certiorari. October 12, 1936.

The property is described as “one dwelling, portable, one garage, one tool…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Willcutts v. BunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Thomas v. GaySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Railroad Co. v. PenistonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Thomson v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1870

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Chief Seattle Properties, Inc. v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Helvering v. Claiborne-Annapolis Ferry Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  4. Geery v. Minnesota Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API